Capitol Hill’s response to the Pennsylvania Senate debate was brutal for Democratic nominee John Fetterman, from Democrats and Republicans alike.
Why it issues: A number of sources puzzled why Fetterman agreed to debate when he clearly wasn’t prepared. Fetterman struggled at instances to answer the moderators’ questions, even with the help of a closed captioning machine.
- “Why the hell did Fetterman comply with this?” one Democratic lawmaker and Fetterman backer advised Axios. “This may clearly elevate extra questions than solutions about John’s well being.”
Fetterman opened the controversy by calling his well being the “elephant” within the room.
- “I had a stroke. He’s by no means let me neglect that,” he mentioned, referring to GOP opponent Mehmet Oz.
- “And I would miss some phrases throughout this debate, mush two phrases collectively, nevertheless it knocked me down and I’m going to maintain coming again up.”
- Fetterman didn’t decide to releasing his full medical information. “My physician believes I am match to serve,” Fetterman mentioned.
The post-debate commentary on NewsNation targeted totally on Fetterman’s well being and capability to serve.
- NewsNation host Leland Vittert mentioned “the most important problem was John Fetterman’s well being and his skill to grasp speech, and to then communicate coherently on the problems of the day.”
One other Pennsylvania Democratic official frightened: “Everyone seems to be nervous. I’ve traveled in all places. Fetterman is a deep concern. And this debate will solely improve it.”
- Sen. Pat Toomey (R-Pa.), on CNN: “It is unhappy to see John Fetterman struggling a lot. He ought to take extra time to permit himself to totally get better. “
The opposite aspect: Different stalwart Fetterman defenders argued that, regardless of the controversy stumble, they gave him credit score for at the very least exhibiting up.
- A senior Democratic official in Pennsylvania advised Axios: “I needed Fetterman was in a greater place to clap again. Total, I argue it wasn’t nice for us however nonetheless a draw. Keep in mind in these subsequent few weeks that Ouncess marketing campaign is spending tens of hundreds of thousands of {dollars} towards a person with a significant medical situation.”
The underside line: A CBS Information/YouGov ballot carried out earlier than the controversy discovered that 46% of respondents believed it is vital for candidates to handle Fetterman’s well being.
- It is onerous to see how Fetterman’s debate efficiency alleviated the issues of the skeptics.
Go deeper:
