In early 1997, Princess Diana determined that she was able to make some room in her closet. Reportedly in session with Prince William, she determined to public sale off 79 of the ballgowns she wore all through her time because the Princess of Wales, with the proceeds to learn the AIDS Belief and the Royal Marsden Hospital, the place she served as patron for eight years. One of many attire on public sale that day, a strapless robe in a regal purple velvet designed by couturier Victor Edelstein, was a selected favourite of Diana’s within the early Nineties. She even sat for a collection of formal portraits within the robe, one in every of which nonetheless hangs within the lobby of the Royal Marsden as we speak. After promoting for $24,150 in 1997, the gown went up for public sale Friday at Sotheby’s as part of their “The One” sale, highlighting iconic objects from throughout human historical past. The gown went for $604,800, manner forward of the public sale home’s $80,000 to $120,000 estimate earlier than the sale.
Based on Cynthia Houlton, Sotheby’s senior vp of vogue and equipment, the robe represents the style of the late Nineteen Eighties, when it was designed, and the timeless qualities that Diana reached for in her wardrobe. “Whenever you consider these very formal robes, they do proceed to return again,” she mentioned. “This robe in some respects appears similar to robes that will’ve been worn 100 years in the past, and there’s some model of this robe that is precisely the identical as we speak.” She cited renewed enthusiasm for velvet on the runway, together with current Alexander McQueen collections for instance of how the look remains to be related as we speak.
Edelstein, a London-born designer who educated underneath Dior earlier than launching his personal line in 1979, started dressing Diana early throughout her time within the royal household, together with her being pregnant with William. He turned identified for outfitting ladies of the British institution in appears that combined society mores with fashionable aptitude, and in 1988, journalist Nicholas Coleridge mentioned he had emerged as “the grasp of the English thoroughbred look.”
Edelstein’s designs for Diana fell exterior of a few of his extra conventional work, partially as a result of the pair fashioned an emotional connection. He instructed Colin McDowell that he tended to not stress Diana together with his personal tastes, though hers have been very completely different. “She was so pushed round on the palace that I used to really feel that I wasn’t going to push her round too,” Edelstein mentioned.
Although he customized many robes for Diana, together with the enduring black gown she wore to bounce with John Travolta on her 1984 tour of the US, the purple velvet robe is from his Autumn 1989 runway assortment. The gathering was proven in July 1989, based on the Sunday Occasions, in a room the place shoppers would “sit on spindly gold chairs underneath the opulent chandeliers of mirrored salons that are simply as one would think about.” The Harpers & Queen columnist who wrote a “Jennifer’s Diary” entry on the present didn’t point out the gown that will later belong to Diana, however she did point out a handful of “distinctive” and “cleverly designed” velvet fits and structured ball robes.
In the summertime of 1991, Diana wore the gown when she sat for her tenth official portrait, which was painted by Douglas Anderson. The painter later instructed Sally Bedell Smith that it was tough for him to keep away from capturing her “horrible disappointment” throughout their 5 periods. “She was on the verge of a nervous breakdown,” he mentioned. “I painted what I noticed.” When Harpers & Queen unveiled the portray within the Could 1992 challenge, author Vicki Woods was happy by the gown and the cabochon amethysts and sapphires, however unimpressed by the likeness. Maybe selecting up on the disappointment, she wrote, “What on earth goes fallacious between [Diana] and the completed canvas?” In hindsight, it’s not onerous to guess that her relationship woes with then-Prince Charles might need been weighing on her in the course of the sitting; the pair would announce their separation in December 1991.
In 2001, Edelstein instructed journalist Sarah Bradford that he understood Diana’s private struggles as he dressed her in the course of the Nineteen Eighties. “The important foundation of that tragedy was that she was in love with him when she married him,” Edelstein famous. As she pulled away from Charles, she started to specific her autonomy by clothes. “She first began to grow to be glamorous when her marriage started to go fallacious.”
By the point she determined to promote her wardrobe in early 1997, she had taken on a brand new strategy to dressing—incorporating extra European designers and taking many fewer alternatives to put on spectacular ball robes. However she did spend another day taking part in gown up within the outdated garments. With photographer Mario Testino and author Cathy Horyn, Diana posed for the 1997 cowl of Vainness Honest, the place she revisited various the robes she beloved, together with the purple velvet Edelstein.
“One look at these images tells the story. The appears she throws at Mario are so heat and confidential they might be her most revealing statements for the reason that divorce,” Horyn mentioned, in a narrative titled “Diana Reborn.” “And contemplating that she had by no means posed for Mario earlier than—did not know the guy till she walked by the door—Diana should have felt terribly free to specific herself as overtly as she did.”
The public sale in 1997, two months earlier than she died tragically on the age of 36, raised $3.25 million altogether. Within the a long time since, her legend has solely grown. That the gown bought for almost 20 instances what it went for in 1997 is just proof that her legacy is outlasting what anybody might need anticipated.
Hearken to Vainness Honest’s DYNASTY podcast now.
