In April, Donald Trump’s legal professionals are set to defend him in civil court docket in opposition to allegations from author E. Jean Carroll that he raped her in a division retailer within the mid-’90s. After they do, they actually, actually need to be certain that jurors will not be allowed to listen to the notorious Entry Hollywood tape wherein Trump brags about grabbing girls “by the pussy” with out their consent. Why? As a result of they understand how dangerous it makes him sound!
In court docket papers filed late Thursday, Trump attorneys Alina Habba and Michael Madaio argued that the 2005 tape, which emerged whereas Trump was working for president the primary time, needs to be banned from the trial. (They need each the tape itself and any references to it blocked.) Calling the recording “irrelevant and extremely prejudicial,” the attorneys declare, per the Related Press, that it “may unjustly be used to recommend to jurors that Trump had a propensity for sexual assault and due to this fact should have raped Carroll.” Why may the tape give jurors that concept, you ask? As a reminder, Trump informed Entry Hollywood host Billy Bush: “I’m routinely drawn to stunning [women]. I simply begin kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Simply kiss. I don’t even wait. And while you’re a star, they allow you to do it. You are able to do something. Seize them by the pussy. You are able to do something.”
Twitter content material
This content material can be considered on the positioning it originates from.
Not surprisingly, Trump’s attorneys additionally reportedly need to block testimony from two girls who’ve alleged sexual misconduct by the ex-president. (Trump has been {accused} of sexual misconduct by at the least 26 girls and has denied any and all allegations in opposition to him.)
Throughout a deposition in October, Trump—who claimed in a 2019 interview with The Hill that Carroll was “completely mendacity” and never his “kind”—mistook Carroll for his second ex-wife, Marla Maples. At different factors within the under-oath deposition, Trump referred to as Carroll a “nut job” and continued to insist that her allegations are a “hoax.”
In maybe associated information, Ivana Trump reportedly mentioned throughout her 1990 divorce deposition that Trump had raped her the prior 12 months, after ripping out handfuls of her hair. She later claimed she had not {accused} him in a “literal or felony sense.”
Oh: Carlson additionally tried to get a reporter fired for fact-checking Trump’s election lies
Along with exposing Fox’s prime brass as large hacks, the Dominion submitting additionally revealed this: