A actuality TV star who says she had a fling with Prince Harry in 2006 tonight claimed that Meghan Markle has ‘forged a spell’ over the Duke of Sussex, amid a deepening row over the couple’s incendiary Netflix collection.
Catherine Ommanney, who claims she loved a two-month fling with the royal when she was 31 and he was 21, stated that she ‘would not recognise’ Harry and insisted he wouldn’t have been the ‘kind of particular person’ to make his bombshell documentary for the US streaming large.
The Actual Housewives of DC starlet advised Piers Morgan Uncensored: ‘What I noticed in him on the time, he was desperately trying to find freedom and privateness, however what he is executed is flip the entire scenario full circle, and now he is acquired no privateness and no freedom.
‘I simply do not know whether or not I might recognise him anymore, personality-wise, as a result of once I watched him on the present, I simply thought why?’.
Catherine Ommanney, who claims she loved a two-month fling with the royal when she was 31 and he was 21, stated that she ‘would not recognise’ Harry and insisted he wouldn’t have been the ‘kind of particular person’ to make his bombshell documentary for the US streaming large
Catherine Ommanney (left, in 2010) claims she loved a two-month fling with Prince Harry (proper, in 2006) when she was 31 and he was 21
She added: ‘She’s [Meghan] acquired a spell over him, and that is why I do not recognise him, as a result of he was once so down-to-earth and regular and there is so little of him I truly recognise.
‘He would by no means in 1,000,000 years again in these days have been the kind of particular person to do that present, ever.’
Requested to explain the prince in 2006, Ms Ommanney stated: ‘Simply actually, actually, actually humorous, complete gentleman, completely down-to-earth’.
MailOnline has approached representatives for the Duke of Sussex for remark.
Ms Ommanney hit the small display when she appeared in American actuality TV present The Actual Housewives of DC.
She met Harry in a bar in Chelsea in 2006, when he was in a long-term on-off relationship with socialite Chelsy Davy.
Harry had an on-off relationship with Chelsy Davy (pictured in 2006) across the time he reportedly met Catherine Ommanney
Ms Ommanney says that after assembly in a bar, the pair then went to Eclipse nightclub in South Kensington collectively, earlier than heading to certainly one of his pal’s homes. There, she says, they ‘shared a cigarette on the steps exterior and [Harry] actually opened-up to [her]’.
After going inside, the Duke made them bacon sandwiches which they ate, earlier than play preventing for quarter of an hour. Ms Ommanney then advised Harry she needed to go dwelling.
She beforehand advised The Solar that they then kissed.
They met a number of extra instances, in accordance with Ms Ommanney, earlier than information of the romance broke, and it got here to an finish.
It wasn’t till 2009, a 12 months after Ms Ommanney married her second husband that the 2 ran into one another once more at a polo match, the place they have been pleasant.
She advised The Solar she ‘hopes Meghan takes care of him’, and that she needs Harry nothing however ‘happiness and success’.
‘He’s a really courageous, charismatic, extremely humorous, clever and beautiful human being,’ she added.
It comes after Harry and Meghan have been slammed by the Queen’s former spokesman, who {accused} them of concocting narratives with ‘extra holes than a colander’.
The Duke confronted a contemporary backlash after sensationally claiming lies have been advised ‘to guard’ his brother William earlier than suggesting he and Meghan have been victims of ‘institutional gaslighting’.
Dickie Arbiter, who served the Queen from 1988 till 2000, {accused} the couple of ‘blended messages’ and stated ‘nobody will consider a phrase they are saying’.
He additionally rubbished solutions the Sussexes had their safety ‘pulled’ previous to Megxit – declaring that it was solely taken away as a result of they have been transferring to America.
Mr Arbiter advised The Solar: ‘There are extra holes of their story than a colander. It’s completely outrageous to be speaking about institutional gaslighting. And their safety was taken away as a result of taxpayers will not pay for them to reside in America. There are such a lot of blended messages. I believe they’ve misplaced course and nobody will consider a phrase they are saying.’
Harry and Meghan have been slammed by the Queen’s former spokesman, who {accused} them of concocting narratives with ‘extra holes than a colander’
In a brand new trailer for the second a part of their profitable tell-all Netflix documentary, the Duke and Duchess of Sussex speak about ‘institutional gaslighting’. It’s assumed that is directed on the monarchy.
Gaslighting is a type of psychological abuse during which an individual is manipulated into questioning their very own sanity and perceptions of actuality.
The documentary makers additionally use an image of Buckingham Palace and photographs of the duke and Prince William at their grandfather’s funeral as Harry says: ‘They have been glad to lie to guard my brother. They have been by no means keen to inform the reality to guard us.’
Meghan provides dramatically: ‘I wasn’t being thrown to the wolves. I used to be being fed to the wolves.’
Tom Bower, who wrote a biography on Meghan this 12 months, has advised the general public acrimony between the inheritor to the throne and his brother is a nasty search for Britain.
